5 linked to ‘Viki Naidu gang’ withdraw application to stop trial

Five men dealing with indictments of being individuals from a coordinated wrongdoing bunch have removed their visit application against an appointed authority in Ipoh for eliminating their attorney from addressing them.

This occurred after attorney Salim Bashir informed a three-part Court of Appeal seat today that the allure of the five connected to “Kumpulan Viki Naidu” had been fixed on Jan 31.

“The present stay application is removed as the allure will be heard one month from now, in front of the preliminary of the five booked to continue on April 25,” he said.

Appointee public investigator Mohd Zain Ibrahim, who showed up for the public examiner, didn’t have a problem with the application.

Seat director Kamaludin Md Said, who sat with M Gunalan and Hashim Hamzah, then, at that point, struck out the application documented by V Vigneswaran Naidu, D Ganesan, P Velmurugan, D Enthiran and K Ganesen.

Last month, the Court of Appeal permitted a between time request to remain the preliminary to permit the arraignment to document an oath in answer to the application.

Preliminary adjudicator Su Tiang Joo of the Ipoh High Court excluded Charan Singh, the legal advisor addressing the five, because he had posed inquiries that recommended he could be a likely observer.

The five documented an allure against Su’s choice.

Su said Charan would be in irreconcilable situation and in break of Rule 28 of the Legal Profession (Practice and Etiquette) Rules 1978. The standard expresses that a legal counselor can’t show up for a situation where he/she is an observer.

Ten men, including the five, are dealing with indictments which convey a most extreme 20-year prison term. At first, eight of them were denied bail as it was a security offense.

Notwithstanding, Su allowed eight of them bail of RM30,000 each in two guarantees, and requested that they be fitted with an electronic checking gadget.

They were likewise requested to give up their identifications to the court and were denied from speaking with observers until the removal of the case.

Leave a Reply