5% oil royalty is the agreement, not ‘wang ehsan’, says Ku Li

There is nothing of the sort as the installment of “wang ehsan” (humane cash) to states under the Petroleum Development Act, says Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah, establishing administrator of Petronas.

The veteran lawmaker said the arrangement among Petronas and the separate state legislatures was for the oil organization to pay the states 5% in real money installments in return for them vesting their hydrocarbon or oil and gas privileges in Petronas.

There was no notice of any wang ehsan in the Act’s vesting deed, he kept up with, while the 5% figure emerged from computations performed by previous Sarawak boss clergyman Abdul Rahman Ya’kub, which was together settled upon by the states and Petronas.

“Under the Petroleum Development Act and the vesting deed that is important for the Act, it’s basically impossible that you can pay what you call wang ehsan, on the grounds that there’s no arrangement for that under the law.

“The understanding was between the separate state legislatures in Malaysia with Petronas, it’s anything but an arrangement between the individual state run administrations and the central government,” he said in a meeting with FMT.

Tengku Razaleigh, recognizably known as Ku Li, said finance serve Tengku Zafrul Aziz probably won’t have been informed completely on the law, to the extent the connection among states and Petronas is concerned.

He said Petronas was compelled by a solemn obligation to pay 5% to each state inside the alliance in return for the vesting of their oil and gas freedoms.

“(Rahman) was the one who offered this equation so we can put all the oil assets of the country into Petronas, a solitary association, having a place with Malaysians, and not to any state or any substance.

“Also, that was a straightforward computation. Out of that cash that is put in Petronas, after all expenses have been dealt with, Petronas then, at that point, pays 5% to each state as money installment yearly. There was no objection about it.”

Tengku Zafrul as of late said Putrajaya would not pay oil sovereignty to any state in Peninsular Malaysia, including Kelantan, which will rather keep on getting wang ehsan for petrol delivered off its coast.

This was met with disillusionment by the Kelantan state government, with representative menteri besar Mohd Amar Nik Abdullah communicating shock at the money priest’s assertion.

The start of ‘wang ehsan’

Tengku Razaleigh said the installments of wang ehsan initially started “all of a sudden” when the Dr Mahathir Mohamad government chose not to keep paying the 5% sovereignty to Terengganu after PAS assumed control over the state government in the last part of the 1990s.

“The initiative of Umno concluded that we will not pay them for dread they may utilize this cash wrongly, and may even utilize it for political purposes,” he said. “That was the reasoning at any rate.”

Be that as it may, the wang ehsan was very surprising contrasted with the 5% money installment, as it was hard to find out the sum determined.

Then again, the 5% installments depended on Rahman’s equation which was settled upon by the states and Petronas, he said.

“I went to each state to carry this draft vesting deed consent to be inspected by the individual state legislatures, on the grounds that we needed solidarity. And all the state legislatures set aside effort to concentrate on it.

“Then, at that point, I went to each state again to arrange, not simply with the main priest or menteri besar, all things considered, however with the exco individuals, and they were exceptionally glad to acknowledge what was proposed by Sarawak.”

He kept up with that he was not saying that the wang ehsan installments were terrible or great, yet that there was at that point an arrangement among Petronas and the states which ought to be respected by Putrajaya.

The previous money serve said it showed that the central government “couldn’t care a whole lot” to an understanding endorsed by a sovereign state inside the league of Malaysia, which could hinder unfamiliar financial backers.

“Assuming you can’t respect a straightforward understanding among yourselves which you marked some time back, how might you expect outsiders who need to come and contribute here to acknowledge that sort of conduct?

“Assuming Putrajaya feels firmly about needing to keep on paying under this wang ehsan plan to the different states concerned, they can proceed.

“However, I’m trying to say that, under the vesting deed understanding, which is essential for the Act, you can’t flee from the way that whatever you make, 5% should go to the state as money installment. That is the understanding.”

Leave a Reply